Protect Your Vote: Get A Receipt
by John Greeley

Hack The Vote

by Paul Krugman
The New York Times, December 2, 2003

Inviting Bush supporters to a fund-raiser, the host wrote, "I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." No surprise there. But Walden O'Dell — who says that he wasn't talking about his business operations — happens to be the chief executive of Diebold Inc., whose touch-screen voting machines are in increasingly widespread use across the United States.

For example, Georgia — where Republicans scored spectacular upset victories in the 2002 midterm elections — relies exclusively on Diebold machines. To be clear, though there were many anomalies in that 2002 vote, there is no evidence that the machines miscounted. But there is also no evidence that the machines counted correctly. You see, Diebold machines leave no paper trail.

Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey, who has introduced a bill requiring that digital voting machines leave a paper trail and that their software be available for public inspection, is occasionally told that systems lacking these safeguards haven't caused problems. "How do you know?" he asks.

What we do know about Diebold does not inspire confidence. The details are technical, but they add up to a picture of a company that was, at the very least, extremely sloppy about security, and may have been trying to cover up product defects.

Early this year Bev Harris, who is writing a book on voting machines, found Diebold software — which the company refuses to make available for public inspection, on the grounds that it's proprietary — on an unprotected server, where anyone could download it. (The software was in a folder titled "") The server was used by employees of Diebold Election Systems to update software on its machines. This in itself was an incredible breach of security, offering someone who wanted to hack into the machines both the information and the opportunity to do so.

An analysis of Diebold software by researchers at Johns Hopkins and Rice Universities found it both unreliable and subject to abuse. A later report commissioned by the state of Maryland apparently reached similar conclusions. (It's hard to be sure because the state released only a heavily redacted version.)

Meanwhile, leaked internal Diebold email suggests that corporate officials knew their system was flawed, and circumvented tests that would have revealed these problems. The company hasn't contested the authenticity of these documents; instead, it has engaged in legal actions to prevent their dissemination.

Why isn't this front-page news? In October, a British newspaper, The Independent, ran a hair-raising investigative report on U.S. touch-screen voting. But while the mainstream press has reported the basics, the Diebold affair has been treated as a technology or business story — not as a potential political scandal.

This diffidence recalls the treatment of other voting issues, like the Florida "felon purge" that inappropriately prevented many citizens from voting in the 2000 presidential election. The attitude seems to be that questions about the integrity of vote counts are divisive at best, paranoid at worst. Even reform advocates like Mr. Holt make a point of dissociating themselves from "conspiracy theories." Instead, they focus on legislation to prevent future abuses.

But there's nothing paranoid about suggesting that political operatives, given the opportunity, might engage in dirty tricks. Indeed, given the intensity of partisanship these days, one suspects that small dirty tricks are common. For example, Orrin Hatch, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, recently announced that one of his aides had improperly accessed sensitive Democratic computer files that were leaked to the press.

This admission — contradicting an earlier declaration by Senator Hatch that his staff had been cleared of culpability — came on the same day that the Senate police announced that they were hiring a counterespionage expert to investigate the theft. Republican members of the committee have demanded that the expert investigate only how those specific documents were leaked, not whether any other breaches took place. I wonder why.

The point is that you don't have to believe in a central conspiracy to worry that partisans will take advantage of an insecure, unverifiable voting system to manipulate election results. Why expose them to temptation?

I'll discuss what to do in a future column. But let's be clear: the credibility of U.S. democracy may be at stake.

Paul Krugman email:


In The News

Global Eye -- Vanishing
Act by Chris Floyd

File Sharing Pits
Copyright Against
Free Speech

Welcome To Hell:
The Pigs Seize Total Control

Electronic Vote Fraud /
HR 2239

The Vote Is The Las
Piece Of Our Democracy

Without Our Vote
We Have Nothing

Maybe everyone who
votes, should just ask
for absentee ballots?

Voting Industry Insiders
Hold Secret Meeting
To Hire Pr Firm To Sell
Electronic Voting To Public

On Election Day 2004,
How Will You Know
If Your Vote Is Properly Counted? Answer:
You Won't -- HR 2239

Will Your Vote Count
In The Next Election?

Johns Hopkins University Electronic Voting Report

Visualize A Fair Election
In 2004

Hack The Vote:
How To Stop Someone From Stealing The 2004 Election

Voter Confidence And
Increased Accessibility
Act of 2003 -- HR 2239

The National Organizatio
Of Citizen Exit Pollers

Black Box Voting --
Ballot Tampering In The
21st Century

Voting Machines Violate Constitution:
Who Will Launch Legal Challenge?

Computer Voting Is Open
To Easy Fraud, Experts Say

Stop The Florida-Tion Of The 2004 Election
Computers Threaten Accountability Of
Voting System

Support Legislation HR 2239 Requiring Voter-Verified
Paper Trail For
2004 Elections

Where Does Your
Congressperson Stand
On HR2239?

Jolted Over Electronic Voting

Group Challenges Voting Software

A Voting And
Democracy Primer

Jim Crow Revived
In Cyberspace

The Theft Of Your Vote
Is Just A Chip Away

The Voting Rights
Struggle Of Our Time

Beyond Voting Machines:
HAVA And Real
Election Reform

Advocates' Guide To
The Help America
Vote Act

Ballots Can Keep Bullets
From Flying

Dare Accepted
Electronic Voting
Machines Programmer
Says She Can
Crack System
Within Minutes

State Election Office
Contact List

What's Happening
in Your State?

eVote Firms Seek
Voter Approval
by Kim Zetter

Media Release:
ISP Rejects Diebold
Copyright Claims
Against News Website

Contact Info